ShareThis

Mechele Linehan is guilty.

A positive place for anyone to post views of guilt or innocence, preferably with supporting factual reasons, if feasible.

What grown woman talks baby talk? Mechele Linehan, in distinct baby voice, gurgles, “It hurts me so badly that someone would think I would hurt their child.” Oh, vomit. MH loved her full-length fur coats as much as animals.

Monday, May 17, 2010

Mechele Linehan: Free Me Not!







Michele Linehan:


Free Me?

Michele Linehan: 


Free Me Not!




What grown woman talks baby talk? Mechele Linehan, in a distinct baby voice, gurgles, “It hurts me so badly that someone would think I would hurt their child.” Oh, vomit. MH loved her full-length fur coats as much as she loved animals.

Information posted on this blog derives from, at minimum, 48 Hours|Hard Evidence|Mystery’s “Love and Death in Alaska”; Dateline’s “The Stripper and the Steelworker”; Oxygen channel’s “Snapped”; Wikipedia; all articles on MH case as published in Alaska Daily News and Washington State-based The Olympian; “Free Me” web site; 38 Points of Appeal; an abundance of comments posted on web containing varying degrees of additional factual information; and further research into, e.g., Martindale & Hubbell attorney peer review ratings, Alaska statutes, bankruptcy law, etc.

There are two Mechele Linehans--Right!
Mechele Hughes (aka Linehan/MH) is best described by Judge Volland: “There are two Michele Linehans . . .” There is the Mechele with the criminal mindset and the Mechele who is a fake, i.e., currently not practicing multiple counts of a class B felony, i.e., theft by deception (Alaska Statute 11.46.120). It is also clear from the preponderance of circumstantial evidence that MH was aware, if not solicitor, of John Carlin’s intent to kill Kent Leppink, whom she conspired with JC to lure to Hope, Alaska. JC’s own email (3/31/96) expresses how frustrated he was by KL’s presence; MH in her cruel, psychopathic HAHAHA email to mother Sandy reveals the disdain MH felt toward KL; MH further discloses in another email to JC that she “needs him more than he will ever know”; and MH’s call to New York Life Insurance Company for a refund was, as the prosecution contended, a ruse, because MH was not owner of KL’s policy and thus lacked authority to make changes. The directive to JC in MH’s 4/27/96 email to inform KL, “if JC sees him,” that she went to Barrows to take care of Brett’s kids is also designed precisely to cover her participation in the Hope plan. KL was with his father during these several days (4/26/96 through 4/30/96), and the Hope plan against KL was implemented once KL’s father returned to Michigan.

MH was essentially overtaken by her estimable ability to coax loser men (marks) out of lots of money in exchange for the opportunity to receive her personal attention. MH latched onto JC and KL because they presented the ineluctable combination of being steadfastly in love with her and having large repositories of money, which they were willing to outcompete one another to spend on MH in order to win her affection. MH turned defrauding men out of money into a cottage industry, which she practiced both from home and in the home.

Exploitation of gayness
What is highly disturbing is MH’s exploitation of the long-outdated stereotype of gayness as a painful, secretive condition that should be kept hidden from family and friends. Here, MH tripped herself up, because her emails to KL discussing impending marriage plans refer to conventional marriage between MH and KL and thereby prove she was lying when she informed the state trooper (as recorded on tape) that her engagement to KL was for his family’s benefit, because “he likes guys.” Forming an enterprise with KL (in commercial fishing no less) and named as beneficiary of his will and life insurance policy were each predicated and procured on the notion of a conventional marriage. After spending his last $15,000 on MH, MH’s marriage plans to KL are exposed as strictly a setup for the final financial gain MH could obtain from KL. Kent’s father, Ken Leppink, informed me in a phone call (thanking me for suggesting he sue MH in civil court for wrongful death and committing theft by fraud) that MH left KL so destitute, he had to pay KL’s Alaska income taxes.

What is equally disgusting is the hatred and disdain MH developed toward KL behind his back, despite the critical role she played feeding into KL’s obsession and exacerbating his feelings toward her. She despised him because no matter how badly she treated him, he persisted in his delusion to set a marriage date and pursue her. She was, however, acutely aware that she had pressed KL for every last ounce of his vulnerability, creating a serious rage that would have been unleashed, unless JC took care of the grave problem KL had become for her, once MH skipped out of KL’s father’s visit to Anchorage. Her explanation for expressing to her sister her feelings, “KL got what he deserved” and “he should have been tortured before he died” was she had “just found out KL had embezzled money from his family.” What rubbish! This woman who had no scruples over defrauding two men out of all their money became “disenchanted” with KL because he embezzled? What a maroon MH is.

Colin Linehan is clueless and driven by self-interest
Bug-eyed, chinless, with a bit of a gopher face, CL is blind, exhibits stupidity, and has zero credibility. He rails at the media and prosecution for portraying MH as “manipulative!, a spiderwoman!, evil!,” when the very emails in evidence illustrate MH is the epitome of extremely manipulative and deceptive, pathological in lying, cruel and contemptuous toward KL, conspiratorial with JC, who has absolutely no regard for other human beings, and who acted as a scorpion. He seizes on the fact there is no direct evidence that MH conspired with JC to kill KL, while remaining bafflingly oblivious to MH core behaviors that remarkably incriminate her as capable of persuading JC to rid MH (and JC) of KL. More disturbingly, he does not consider the severe damage MH inflicted in the lives of her three male friends/marks/“fiancès.” CL is desperate to have his choice of an innocent-of-any-wrongdoing wife confirmed. He refuses to accept or acknowledge that MH acted far beyond a practicing stripper’s vocation. She conned men and further took exceptional advantage of JC and KL for multiple tens of thousands of dollars in diamonds, other jewelry, clothes, fur coats, house repairs, car payments, cash, etc. Who at the age of 21 concerns herself with obtaining a million dollar life insurance policy on a mark?

Bankruptcy is advantageous
Chapter 13 bankruptcy is not serious as one might think, because it allows the Linehans to be absolved of all attorney fee debt while receiving uninterrupted a physician’s high income. The dermatologic/laser/cosmetic medical business MH and CL were beginning to operate was also taking off, and it promised to be a substantial money-maker.

Circumstantiality of evidence
By far, the majority of cases are decided on circumstantial evidence only, because offenders are careful enough not to leave any direct forensic proof behind. The circumstantial evidence in this case makes for a very compelling argument for guilt. MH implored her sister Melissa to delete the contents of her computer before its seizure in the investigation, but Melissa refused.

Top-rated (AV peer-rated) appellate attorneys Feldman and Orlansky were unwilling to represent MH in second trial, which indicates the case presents serious problems to establishing MH’s innocence.

©2010 Critically Correct Publications
 ______________________________________________________________________________________________

May 17, 2010

Dear Mr. Gullufsen,

FYI, the following excerpt from The News Tribune, dated 5/13/10, written by Meg Holland of Alaska Daily News, discloses a startlingly false reinvention of the facts by Mechele Linehan. Text in bold is the offensive content. To my knowledge, nowhere did Fitzgerald or Maassen indicate the "agreements" or "arrangements" in the first trial's transcripts with the specificity Ms. Linehan now claims:

"Linehan was 23 when Leppink, a 34-year-old commercial fisherman, died. She says she doesn’t know who killed him. [Oh, brother. Although conviction was overturned owing to untimely death, John Carlin III was established as the shooter.] She and Leppink were staying at Carlin’s South Anchorage house while Linehan’s Wasilla home underwent renovations and Leppink waited for the summer fishing season to start. At one time during those months, Linehan agreed to marry Leppink but it was more of a business deal than for love, she said.

She says Leppink was gay and that he offered to pay her to be his wife, as a front to fool his Christian family in Michigan. He would live in her house and take care of her animals in the winter while she traveled, and she would live in the house and manage his fishing business in the summer. She backed out of the deal after a week, she said. [EGADS! She did not back out of the life insurance, and what about her "saving money for college" goal she maintained was reason for job as exotic dancer?]
“Prosecutors have painted Linehan as a femme fatale who was engaged to multiple men at once, playing them all for their money. She says that’s not true."
[So which is it on the engagement? Business deal or front to fool his Michigan Christian family to hide fact he was gay, when he was not gay. In recording with state trooper, Mechele Hughes claims in interview that her engagement to KL was because he was gay, and here she trips herself up, because her emails to KL discuss only conventional marriage plans with KL. She is as unintelligent as she is fake. Furthermore, MH sought to separate herself from the ‘ inferior’ inmate population by changing jobs from sewing uniforms during daytime to washing/waxing floors during graveyard shift at night.] 


MH's medical emergency is alleged to have been a leaking breast implant (source: comment ostensibly from Highland Correctional inmate [although they are not supposed to have access to computers] posted after ADN article).


MH was placed into solitary several times for breaking rules (source: The News Tribune, dated 5/13/10).


MH will not testify in her own defense in upcoming trial, currently slated for September 2010, because she will be unable to withstand cross-examination by prosecution concerning, at minimum, contradictions between her oral accounts and email contents.


Cordially,

Dr. and Mrs. [masked] and [masked] [masked]

©2010 Critically Correct Publications

______________________________________________________________________________________________

31 comments:

  1. I agree with your take and also consider this woman to be vile. She is definitely an accessory to murder, because there is no way she could not have known John Carlin intended to murder TT. She deserves a sentence of 25 more years!

    ReplyDelete
  2. What are her new bail conditions while awaiting the new trial? One would think she shouldn't be allowed to be dating men she met online. Good grief ML is quite the she devil, too bad her husband doesn't see her for the chameleon she really is! My heart goes out to the Leppink family.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mechele Linehan is innocent. kl was a gay man who was in love with jc.. the whole story is not out there..you are infact being paid to put this crap out there aren't you? you should be held liable for slander, defamation of character when she wins her upcoming trial. good riddens sucker! go jump off a bridge

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Michele Linehan herself is Bi-Sexual. She is a typical "switch hitting stripper" calling KL gay is just one way of covering her own "true lifestyle" . Her sexual prefrence is the other big secret she does'nt want to get out especially to all the PTA mom's OR the Dopey Dr.

      Delete
    2. Another feminazi running her bush filled mouth! She is guilty as shit and should be crucified with you right next to her!!!!!!

      Delete
  4. The information you've touted as factual is just as flimsy as things you accuse the defense of. Seriously, an inmate speculating about a breast implant, the defendant's small voice, a negative inference from her appellate firm not conducting a trial level case, a handful of crime shows feeding off the same lack of evidence, the method of bankruptcy they've selected, the defendant's husband's chin, and an negative inference from her assertion of her fifth amendment rights--really??? There are reams of case law detailing exactly why stuff like this is not relevant to the issue of guilt. Red herring at best. You're a prosecutor's wet dream juror. Congratulations.

    ReplyDelete
  5. So you want the courts to crucify her because you perceive her to be a murderer? If she were black, poor, and undereducated, would you even be here writing a blog about her? Or are you trying to capitalize on the sexualisation of an attractive woman from the suburbs being charged with murder? If you have already pre-determined the verdict in your mind and are unwilling to change that verdict, even in the presence of evidence which contradicts your verdict, how are you NOT propagating injustice?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First off an educated , innocent women can defend her self by taking the stand. #-1 She is NOT that attractive #-2 because of HER hidden life style (Bi-Sexual) she accused Ken Leppink of being gay. Gay man typically DO NOT (use your head on this one) go to strip clubs to see girls dance partially naked and get lap dances . Let alone throw money at them. She IS a liar ! She got caught. She know's what she did and she know's what she is. A normal, decent girl does'nt strip to earn $ for college. Strip club's are were girls who share her "sexual life style" can hook up with one another while . Sadly, the Dr will eventually "get it" one day. Hopefully not before it's to late. sad for him. Sad for the kid.

      Delete
  6. This woman is a self centered woman , who knew what was happening she is playing stupid she just wanted money and she didnt get it i hope she never gets out of prison , she is another casey anthony no care of other people feelings or thoughts trying to blame any one but herself

    ReplyDelete
  7. A positive place?? My ass!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. This woman is a user and a killer......I feel for her husband. Of course people love her now.....She re-invented herself once again and you dumbasses believe her. You are the type of people that she prays on......She is a opportunist and I don't want her getting away with murder, Wake up people.....

    ReplyDelete
  9. Is she out or is she still in jail....Just saw her story he other day and outraged.....

    ReplyDelete
  10. She's nothing more than a high priced murderous whore, and she's married to sucker!

    ReplyDelete
  11. this is not about Mechele Hughes morality - or lack of it - no matter the personal opinion, it's not a crime. The question is, can it be proven that she was involved in the murder beyond reasonable doubt.
    Come on people, this is about the law of the land not about opinions. If you would stand trial, would you like to be judged fairly or by someone's opinion!?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To call Ken Leppink "Gay" when the man used to come and watch her dance partially naked. Give him lap dances knowing he was falling for her. While taking any other money she could get off of him. While she herself was having sexual encounter's with other female stripper's does call into question her credibility. First, she's trying to clearly cover-up her own true "life-style" while destroying Ken Leppinks. This girl has NO shame what so ever. She deep down IS a man hater and is using the Dr. just like she used the other men in alaska. EVIL !!

      Delete
    2. I'd never heard mention of her having relations with the other strippers. I have no belief that she is a man-hater, simply that she had assets, being female/breasts/thighs, that allowed her to exploit people exploitable to that. Men. They did find her at a strip club where there is a pretty good understanding that this will be a certain type of relationship. All three fiance's believed they had passed a threshold concerning that. I'm not sure a single one did. Being a stripper probably dulls some ethics, just like being a participant, an observer, of one also does. I don't see any reason to mention an opinion on her husband's appearance, unless it is the expression on his face. Personally, I doubt she was unaware that Ken L. was going to be murdered, that John C. was going to be the murderer, and that she believed she would have benefited from his death.

      Delete
  12. Michele Hughes-Linehan herself is Bi-Sexual and has had several Lesbian sexual encounters with other strippers while working to "save money for college" deep down she IS a man hater. She knew she was in trouble an latched on to Colin Lenihan because she knew she needed a front. If she should get away with this it will only be a couple years before she divorce's the "Good Doctor" and moves on again. After she clean's him out financially. Dr. Lenihan in his infinate"lack of street smarts" will be her next victim !! Very sad...

    ReplyDelete
  13. That bitch is pure evil and a cold blooded killer..It's amazing that her husband can graduate medical school but can't see what a demon she is..When she finishes bleeding him dry, she'll be out looking for another mark.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I don't approve of the stripper manipulation for money, but if a guy wants to buy a fantasy, that's what a stripper is selling. A stripper would not worry about the motivation of a client. I don't think Kent really loved Mechele. He just wanted a trophy wife. That Mechele was a stripper doesn't prove she had Kent killed. That her appellant lawyers were not going to represent her in the second trial doesn't prove anything about the case the prosecutor ultimately didn't have against her. It was the prosecutor who forced the first set of lawyers for her retrial to withdraw from her case. It was something about a technical conflict of interest. Mechele isn't likely to divorce Colin anytime soon in spite of the rumors some inmates started about her supposed Lesbianism. Mechele only told the police what she knew about Kent. She didn't say for sure whether Kent was gay or bi-sexual. It would be hard to find out now. His friends who would know have died. One of Kent's friends who didn't seem like a woman in his comments in the Anchorage Daily News said that Kent's eyes were pretty. What man would say something like that unless he was gay?

    http://www.othercircumstances.blogspot.com/?zx=80cb37134b952529

    ReplyDelete
  15. fatty liver symptoms causes and treatment fatty liver symptoms causes
    and treatment fatty liver symptoms causes and treatment

    my homepage fatty liver disease treatment and diet

    ReplyDelete
  16. Harper laser treatment rosacea

    Feel free to surf to my weblog - Meadows rosacea doctor

    ReplyDelete
  17. A surefire way to create buzz. Start building a column
    with dimensions of the major things we discuss is the necessity of having clearly defined goals--both business and social goals--before
    agreeing to the partnership. If your student loans people
    message. So student loans people is the business function that identifies customer internet activity
    and charges a different rate for using Facebook than watching YouTube, while allowing access to Vodafone services for free.
    In addition to partnering with the Diabetes Association, I also ran commercials during the show.



    Visit my homepage - Student Loans for People with Bad Credit

    ReplyDelete
  18. YAY SHE IS FREE I am so excited that justice was finally served in this case the jury convicted her because the prosecution made it seem like being a stripper automatically meant that she was capable of anything GIVE ME A F...ING BREAK

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Make up your mind? You contradict yourself. Is she free or did they convict her in the 2nd trial?

      Delete
    2. Ed..er..Mechele...er..Colin...stop smoking whatever it is...your brain cells are fried

      Delete
  19. I don't believe she pulled the trigger but I do believe she was a manipulative bitch who used John Carlin as a puppet. I mean why would she ring up about the life insurance policy 2 days after his death??? She's a typical sociopath. If you look up the meaning of one, she fits it. Sociopaths have the ability to suck people in around them, which she has done to her current husband and family.

    So is she free or not? I can't find any info on this?

    ReplyDelete
  20. This evil and vile woman should have rotted in jail or perhaps gotten the death penalty. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know she is guilty and will take that to her grave. I hope her scumbag husband will one day come to his senses, and her child will grow up knowing that his/her mom was and always will be a monster. Hear that Mechele?

    ReplyDelete
  21. That fake "baby-voice" was so obviously fake and disgusting. Oh, yes, don't all sweet, innocent mothers write emails that state the best place to move after committing a crime? Don't all sweet mothers write emails that state basically, "we could go here because that country doesn't extradite, no matter how serious the crime?" Yes, I write those emails to friends all the time. Doesn't everyone? This gold-digger played them all, including her doctor husband. She'll get what she wants from her husband and then leave him too. It's the mentality of the stripper. You can take the female from being a stripper, but you'll never take the stripper from the female.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I guess you have to of had the experience of being around a bi-polar, hyper-sexual stripper to understand how manipulative they can be. Who knows , maybe Dr Clueless is a true "Godsend" for this wack-a-doo girl. The thing is she knows damn well what she did and that's something that will always prey on her mind. Like any other textbook , bi-polar wack job. She has a true split personality. I'm sure her husband has already witnessed this numerous times but just goes into denial. Eventually, her hyper-sexual prowess will surface to the point where she won't care what the good Dr. catches her doing. It's just in her to be that way. She'll use any excuse in regards to her past vindication as a reason for doing it. I truly feel for the kid. In the meantime I'm sure many neighbors and close affiliates of the Linahans have indeed caught onto her act. She might be educated but she still has and always will have that deviate side to her. Again, I feel for the kid. The Dr. husband is just an educated dumb dumb with no street smarts what so ever. Poor guy.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I think they are separated now

    ReplyDelete
  24. Whatever happened to her sister

    ReplyDelete

A positive forum for anyone to post views re Mechele Hughes Linehan's guilt (and/or innocence) and for adding additional factual information to case as it develops (please provide source when feasible).